🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.